Police don't want anything to do with New York gun law

What this article doesn't mention is that the cops are likely pissed because the law forgot to exempt them.  Since I haven't heard of any successful amendments being passed (though I could have missed them -- I don't live in New York), that means the police are still in violation of the law themselves.  Of course they won't enforce it on each other.

It's amazing how a simple drafting mistake can increase "professional courtesy" in an entire state!
So much so that, last week, the New York State Troopers Police Benevolent Association issued a statement distancing troopers from Cuomo and warning of public resentment toward law enforcement since the gun law's passage.
No shit, sherlock.
A poll by the Siena Research Institute, released in March, found that 61 percent of New Yorkers like the NY SAFE Act, with the greatest support among the state's large pool of registered Democrats. However, 48 percent of those polled also said they felt the law was rushed into enactment, in a bout of emotion following the Newtown massacre.

A similar poll released this week by Quinnipiac University found that 63 percent of voters said they support the new gun laws. The pollsters noted a regional split, with supporters of the NY SAFE Act concentrated in the New York City area, while upstate voters disapprove.
In other words, voters in New York City -- who don't own guns, because their city's laws represent an effective ban on firearms to anyone who isn't a cop, a public figure, or a bodyguard -- are quite happy to vote their more rural citizens into a similar state of disarmed victimhood.  And that's assuming that the polls are accurate.

On Wednesday, William G. Greene, a Saratoga-area man, became one of the first to run afoul of a provision sealing the so-called "private sale loophole." Greene posted to a Facebook page for gun enthusiasts, announcing he was selling an RUNS .223 caliber rifle.

He found a buyer, who turned out to be an undercover state trooper. If Greene had sold the weapon a week earlier, before provisions of the new gun law took effect, he would have gone home with a pocket full of cash. Instead, he was hauled off in handcuffs.

In other words, someone is most likely going to prison for 5-10 years and subsequently rendered unemployable for the rest of his life for doing something that harmed no one, was legal a week ago, and for which he had no criminal intent.

When this is how the law works, people lose respect for the law.

Hat tip to JammieWearingFool.

This entry was published Thu Apr 25 05:19:11 CDT 2013 by TriggerFinger and last updated 2013-04-25 05:19:11.0. [Tweet]

comments powered by Disqus

Subscribe to Atom Feed

I am not a lawyer, and nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice.

This site is run on custom blog software and is being actively developed. Please be forgiving of errors.

This website is an Amazon affiliate and will receive financial compensation for products purchased from Amazon through links on this site.