Indeed, in virtually all cases where someone tries to link support for
the rights of gun ownership to unlawful behavior, the facts paint a much
different picture. The truth is, the vast majority of gun crimes are
committed with guns that were obtained illegally. While the issues are
often lightning rods for attack, fewer than 2 percent of all gun crimes
involve guns purchased at gun shows, and concealed-carry permit holders
commit so few crimes that the statistics can't even be tracked. When faced
with these facts, anti-gun enthusiasts are left with only one option:
attack on personal and/or cultural grounds. This is why we've become
inundated with stories and depictions of gun nuts and violent extremists.
Apparently, opponents of the right to bear arms believe that, if they can
paint all supporters of gun rights with the same big brush, they don't have
to come up with any real arguments.
I was reading an anti-gun editorial just before I read Orrin's piece. Here are some selected quotes from the other article:
deep-pocketed influence peddling with political campaigns... people can see if their daycare worker or dentist is armed... "The NRA is asking gunmen to refrain from mass shootings while key gun
bills are before legislators," says a newscaster in a recent editorial
cartoon... the NRA realized its wet dream last year... recoiled at its paranoid secessionist/military weapon wing...
The only argument the anti-gun side has left is cultural bigotry and guilt by association. They want to blame gun rights supporters for criminals who use guns illegally, and ignore the fact that every day, millions of gun owners did not use their guns to hurt anyone. In fact, if you believe the National Crime Victimization Survey, approximate 220 people use a firearm to defend themselves each day. (That's the low-end estimate, by the way).
This entry was published Wed Jun 03 07:03:30 CDT 2009 by TriggerFinger
and last updated 2009-06-03 07:03:30.0.