TriggerFinger


Kennedy: Militia clause a reaffirmation...


More from SCOTUSBlog:
Justice Kennedy was very active in today's argument.  He asked the second question, advancing a theme to which he repeatedly returned:  that the first clause of the Second Amendment merely was a "reaffirmation" of the Constitution's militia clauses, and suggested that the first clause did not limit the distinct right to keep and bear arms (which he referred to as the "operative clause"), which was unconnected -- he used the phrase "quite independent" -- from militia service.  Kennedy expressed the view that the Second Amendment was a "supplement to" the militia clauses.  Kennedy also returned several times to the 1689 English Bill of Rights as the model for the Second Amendment.  Kennedy also indicated that he does not put a lot of stake in the Court's opinion in Miller, saying that it ends abruptly and does not fully elaborate the interests encompassed by the Amendment.
This is a good sign, and I agree with Kennedy that Miller opinion does not fully elaborate the interests encompassed by the 2nd Amendment?  How could it, when only one side of the argument was heard?

I think Kennedy's comments can be taken as foreshadowing a lengthy opinion that will attempt to fully elaborate those interests, as well as a positive sign about which way the decision will likely go.

Here's some more analysis of Kennedy's comments.

The poll of readers concerning the expected outcome of the case is running at 92% Heller, 5% DC.

This entry was published Tue Mar 18 11:16:35 CDT 2008 by TriggerFinger and last updated 2008-03-18 11:16:35.0. [Tweet]

comments powered by Disqus

Subscribe to Atom Feed

I am not a lawyer, and nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice.

This site is run on custom blog software and is being actively developed. Please be forgiving of errors.


This website is an Amazon affiliate and will receive financial compensation for products purchased from Amazon through links on this site.