New Hampshire election audit to examine US Senate race
The 2020 race had a US Senate seat in New Hampshire, won by a Democrat originally elected in 2008 by 56% to 41%. That seems like a very big gap to be attributable to machine fraud, so overturning the result of that race seems like a big stretch even if you account for a libertarian getting 2.3%.
But the point of doing the audit is to be able to trust the results, not to change the outcome. Let's find out if the machine fraud was widespread.
Note that this audit outcome is happening even with the audit team arguably selected by the Senate to cover things up. I think maybe a decision has been made that it can't be covered up completely, so look for efforts to do damage control instead.
This entry was published Wed May 19 00:37:51 CDT 2021 by TriggerFinger
and last updated 2021-05-19 00:37:51.0.
[Tweet]