Speculations on Parker and the Hughes Amendment

XLRQ has some good thoughts.  It would take a separate case to challenge the Hughes amendment (which prohibits registration of new fully-automatic firearms) specifically, but Parker would probably count as binding precedent IF the Supreme Court upholds it in substantially similar form.  I'm not sure how likely that is, but I also find it very hard to imagine how the 2nd Amendment could allow for weaselling around this issue. 

What are the points of commonality?
There's even one factor in favor of a challenge to the Hughes Amendment, and that is the almost complete lack of criminal use of registered Class III weapons.  Finding criminal use of handguns is not difficult.  It's probably not even very difficult to find criminal use of handguns registered in the District by retired police officers.

This entry was published Sun Mar 11 12:09:30 CDT 2007 by TriggerFinger and last updated 2007-03-11 12:09:30.0. [Tweet]

comments powered by Disqus

Subscribe to Atom Feed

I am not a lawyer, and nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice.

This site is run on custom blog software and is being actively developed. Please be forgiving of errors.

This website is an Amazon affiliate and will receive financial compensation for products purchased from Amazon through links on this site.