Two different theories is accurate enough, but it doesn't reduce the sting much compared to explanations based around campaign financing.
I think Rudy wants to stick to theories he has solid evidence for. He recognizes Powell has what sounds like a wild and crazy conspiracy theory. Maybe she has evidence for it, maybe not -- but if not, best his own more grounded cases not be considered guilty by association.
I consider this quite reasonable. Powell has had excellent sources in the intel community in the past and remains closely associated with Flynn, who also does. She may be on to something. But without solid evidence to present, which may be complicated by law enforcement activity and classification issues, it may be difficult to prove on the very compressed timeline we're on now.
Of course, there's another possible explanation:
I don't imagine that helped.
This entry was published Tue Nov 24 14:02:32 CST 2020 by TriggerFinger
and last updated 2020-11-24 14:02:32.0.