More statistical analysis of PA voting

The National Pulse“This means that the number of Biden votes in ten of the outlier counties was 101%± of registered Democratic voters (vs the majority of other PA counties where it was 70%± — an extraordinary statistical difference). That is not logical or reasonably explainable legally. The most likely explanation is that excess votes were added to the Biden total that did not come from voters.“

“These facts suggest a mathematically extraordinary event occurring in multiple counties simultaneously at a magnitude well above what is needed to change which candidate won Pennsylvania’s electoral votes.”

The Biden vote change over Hillary Clinton’s vote in 2016 in Montgomery County, PA shows a mathematically fraudulent result that is adding votes unnaturally to the tail of the distribution. High turnout or massive changes in voter preferences cannot statistically create this result in any reasonable probability. The signature is mathematical evidence of a classical form of fraud called “stuffing the curve”. The 2008 sub-prime mortgage risk management meltdown is a recent example of this kind of fraud.

Again, and again, and again, we have these statistical anomalies popping up only in the battleground states using Dominion that Biden needed to win.

This entry was published Wed Nov 18 05:51:07 CST 2020 by TriggerFinger and last updated 2020-11-18 05:51:07.0. [Tweet]

Follow @TriggerBlog

comments powered by Disqus

Related Categories

Subscribe to Atom Feed

I am not a lawyer, and nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice.

This site is run on custom blog software and is being actively developed. Please be forgiving of errors.

This website is an Amazon affiliate and will receive financial compensation for products purchased from Amazon through links on this site.

BlogRoll

Categories

Most Popular

Featured Posts

Archives

More statistical analysis of PA voting

Related Categories