Crowdstrike admits no evidence of network extraction of emails

Their until-recently secret testimony indicates that the emails were "prepared for extraction" but they had no evidence the emails were actually extracted over the network. How else would they be extracted, save by an insider who had physical access to the server?

This entry was published Thu May 14 10:28:41 CDT 2020 by TriggerFinger and last updated 2020-05-09 04:06:15.0. [Tweet]

comments powered by Disqus

Related Categories

Subscribe to Atom Feed

I am not a lawyer, and nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice.

This site is run on custom blog software and is being actively developed. Please be forgiving of errors.

This website is an Amazon affiliate and will receive financial compensation for products purchased from Amazon through links on this site.