TriggerFinger


BlogRoll

From the Barrel of a Gun
Lurking Rhythmically
Random Nuclear Strikes
Daily Pundit
Borepatch
Only Guns and Money
Mostly Cajun
Massad Ayoob
The View From North Central Idaho
Armed and Dangerous
Hell in a Handbasket
View From The Porch
Patterico
Guns, Cars, and Tech
Alphecca
Legal Insurrection
Irons in the Fire
Volokh Conspiracy
Snowflakes in Hell
Shot in the Dark
MArooned
Power Line
Michael Bane
Reason
The Smallest Minority
Publicola
Sharp as a Marble
The Silicon Greybeard
3 boxes of BS
Saysuncle
Alphecca
Of Arms and the Law
Bacon, Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, Explosives
Infodancer
Speculative Fiction
GunBlogBlackList
John Lott
Confiscation
IRS Scandal
Monster Hunter Nation
Right to be Armed

Categories

FeedBoomershoot 2008 
FeedPolice Abuse 
FeedBoomershoot 2009 
Feed1st Amendment 
FeedCapital of the Free World 
FeedIllegal Mayors 
FeedBorder Control 
FeedFirearms 
FeedJury Nullification 
FeedHeller 
FeedCivil Rights 
FeedChicago Gun Case 
FeedWaco 
FeedParker 
FeedBenghazi 
FeedProperty Rights 
FeedAffirmative Action 
FeedZero Tolerance 
FeedSupreme Court 
FeedGeorge W Bush 
FeedVictimization Period 
FeedFalse-Flag Ops 
FeedConcealed Carry 
FeedSocial Security 
FeedConfiscation 
FeedGun Buy-Back 
FeedLibertarian Party 
FeedINDUCE Act 
FeedFree Speech 
FeedConstitution 
FeedArms Control 
FeedAssault Weapons 
FeedAtkins 
FeedDrug War 
FeedBudgetary Insanity 
FeedGoverningByConsent 
Feed2008 Elections 
FeedGilmore v Gonzales 
FeedBoomershoot 
FeedRegistration 
FeedTerrorism 
FeedImmigration 
FeedStand Your Ground 
FeedKonie v LA 
FeedLawsuits 
FeedBeretta 
FeedGovernment 
FeedMillion Mom March 
FeedFair Trial 
FeedBATF 
FeedEconomics 
FeedPrivacy 
FeedTrigger Locks 
FeedActivism 
Feed4th Amendment 
FeedAir Travel 
FeedSelf-Defense 
FeedCurrency 
FeedSamuel Alito 
Feed.50 Caliber Rifles 
FeedMiller 
FeedCampaign Finance 
Feed2004 Elections 
FeedEnvironment 
FeedLegal Filings 
FeedGun Show Loophole 
FeedThe Case of the .50-Caliber Felony 
FeedBean 
FeedAnti-Gun 
FeedCryptography 
FeedTaxation 
FeedCopyright 
FeedWiretaps 
FeedFast and Furious 
FeedEminent Domain 
FeedS1805 
FeedLiberty 
FeedMicrostamping 
FeedSchool Shootings 
FeedSurveillance 
FeedDMCA 
FeedCourt Rulings 
FeedHandguns 
FeedWesley Clark 
FeedDefensive Gun Use 
FeedMcDonald v Chicago 
FeedBrady 
FeedMedia Bias 
FeedHomeschooling 
FeedEmerson 
FeedRuby Ridge 
FeedRFID 
FeedSoftware Patents 
FeedRepublican Party 
FeedSeegars 
FeedBan 
FeedSilveira 
FeedIntellectual Property 
FeedArming America 
FeedMichael Badnarik 
FeedIRS Scandal 
FeedMilitia 
FeedPatriot Act 
FeedCAPPS-II 
FeedBackground checks 
Feed5th Amendment 
FeedEducation 
FeedArmed-Pilots 
FeedBallistic Fingerprinting 
Feed2nd Amendment 
FeedHiibel Case 
FeedFair Elections 
FeedSmart Guns 
FeedVegas Shooting 

Most Popular

Featured Posts

Subscribe to Atom Feed

Archives

Majorities think Obama spied on Trump and want a special counsel


Investor's Business DailyAmericans overwhelmingly believe the Obama administration "improperly surveilled" Donald Trump's presidential campaign, and a majority say they would like to see a special prosecutor appointed to look into possible misconduct by the FBI and Department of Justice in spying on Trump, the latest IBD/TIPP poll shows.
Some 55% of those said it was "likely" that the Obama administration "improperly surveilled the Trump campaign during the 2016 election." There was an obvious partisan split among the responses, with 87% of Republicans and 55% of independents saying the improper spying took place, but only 31% of Democrats.

On the question of whether a special counsel was needed to "investigate whether the FBI and the Department of Justice improperly surveilled the Trump campaign during the 2016 presidential election," 54% responded "yes," and 44% "no." Again, 74% of Republicans and 50% of independents wanted a special counsel appointed. But even 44% of Democrats thought it would be a good idea.

They took their responses only from those who claimed they were following the story "very closely" or "somewhat closely". That doesn't invalidate their numbers, particularly the Democrat numbers, but does mean the results aren't necessarily predictive of election results.

Check below the fold for a poll with a more general audience.
RasmussenA new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 42% of Likely U.S. Voters believe Russia is more likely than the FBI to have meddled in the 2016 presidential race. But 34% now think the FBI is more likely to have meddled in the election, while one-in-four voters (24%) are not sure which was the bigger meddler.

Rasmussen headlines it as 42% think Russia meddled more in the election than the FBI, but that's misleading. Why? Well, first off, let's present the rest of the story:

RasmussenSeventy-two percent (72%) of liberals and a plurality (48%) of moderates think Russia is likely to have meddled more. But 55% of conservative voters believe the FBI was the bigger meddler of the two. [...] Forty-eight percent (48%) of all voters said in December that senior federal law enforcement officials broke the law in an effort to prevent Trump from winning the 2016 election. Forty-one percent (41%) disagreed... most voters (53%) still disagreed with the FBI's decision not to seek an indictment of the Democratic presidential nominee for her sloppy handling of classified information...

So what's the big picture here? Most people seem to think that both the FBI and Russia meddled, but Russia meddled "more". That doesn't exactly exonerate the FBI, and a clear majority think the FBI improperly cleared Hillary even if they don't characterize it as election meddling. And there's a large pool of undecideds who remain to be convinced. Of those people following the issue closely, a clear majority thought the FBI had improperly spied on the Trump campaign. That suggests that if those undecideds learn more about the issue in the lead-up to the midterms, they will be convinced. Some portion of those convinced will likely switch their vote, even though Obama and Hillary are not on the ballot.

But that doesn't mean the Republicans will win the upcoming 2018 midterms. Because, to borrow a phrase, the media is all about deciding what the public shouldn't know about because it would hurt Democrats.

This entry was published Tue Feb 13 09:59:46 CST 2018 by TriggerFinger and last updated 2018-02-13 09:59:46.0. [Tweet]

comments powered by Disqus
If you would like to receive new posts by email:

I am not a lawyer, and nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice.

This site is run on custom blog software and is being actively developed. Please be forgiving of errors.


This website is an Amazon affiliate and will receive financial compensation for products purchased from Amazon through links on this site.