Conflicting narratives

I've previously reported on claims that the Vegas murderer may not have acted alone, with the evidence mainly being suspicious email exchanges on accounts police claim he had sole access to and anonymously sourced claims suggesting more arrests were being considered. However, the preliminary report says Paddock was acting alone.

How to reconcile these claims? Well, the preliminary report is from October 1st, 2017. Perhaps the investigating agencies are just keeping things quiet while they run down leads and try to apprehend any other suspects... or perhaps they still don't want to admit it was terrorism. Given the number of conspiracies revealed at the FBI and DOJ lately, coupled with the very strange information released about this attack already, I'm leaning towards the latter.

This entry was published Thu Jan 25 09:28:09 CST 2018 by TriggerFinger and last updated 2018-01-25 09:28:09.0. [Tweet]

comments powered by Disqus

Subscribe to Atom Feed

I am not a lawyer, and nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice.

This site is run on custom blog software and is being actively developed. Please be forgiving of errors.

This website is an Amazon affiliate and will receive financial compensation for products purchased from Amazon through links on this site.