TriggerFinger


Felon-with-a-gun case tossed out on gun rights


The judge reasons that the defendant was not a violent felon. He was convicted previously of carrying a concealed weapon (the felony charge), and has some violent criminal issues in his past that did not rise to felonies.

I think this is probably the right call in this case. Misdemeanors, even violent ones, do not result in a lifetime prohibition on firearms possession. This is appropriate, because denying someone their right to defend themselves is a big deal. It seems that the only felony conviction in this case is for carrying a concealed firearm, not doing anything violently illegal with it. As such, the felony conviction would amount to a catch-22; he can't possess a firearm because he was once caught carrying a concealed firearm.

The decision is as-applied, meaning that the law in general stays in place; only this specific individual's case is thrown out.

We should probably be wary of anti-gun judges trying to throw out some questionable cases to troll for negative PR.

This entry was published Sun Jun 28 10:03:45 CDT 2015 by TriggerFinger and last updated 2015-06-28 10:03:45.0. [Tweet]

comments powered by Disqus

Subscribe to Atom Feed

I am not a lawyer, and nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice.

This site is run on custom blog software and is being actively developed. Please be forgiving of errors.


This website is an Amazon affiliate and will receive financial compensation for products purchased from Amazon through links on this site.