I predict that they don't care about state funding, because it doesn't come out of their pocket. All they want to do is delay things as long as possible, and when they can't delay any more, DOJ will swoop in.
This is not how I arrived at vaccine hesitancy (or to be more honest, outright refusal) but it is part of it. I simply don't trust anything being pushed so hard, and when I evaluate the actual risks of the disease, it's just not scary (to me, at my age and general state of health). A vaccine is simply not necessary for the vast majority of the population at low risk even if they get the disease; and there are available treatment options if you do get it. And that's before you consider the risks of the vaccine itself (particularly antibody-dependent enhancement).
So my answer is and will be no, and that's not based on the way that health officials, media, and government collectively have squandered every bit of trust they ever had.
That summary is a little misleading. It happens the other way, too. The real question is how often in each direction, and why?
I looked at some of the ballot images, and it was basically impossible to fairly judge many of them as for one candidate or the other. Many, probably most, had strong marks near both candidates, such that judging who the voter preferred is an exercise in human bias. Did they fill in the oval first, and then change their mind and put a check mark against the other guy? Did they check and then fill? Was the check deliberate or accidental?
The bottom line is that the rules both forbid and encourage adjudicators to try to read the minds of voters when marks are unclear. This is stupid. If a ballot is marked ambiguously for a race, it simply should not count for that race. That's better than allowing bias to be the deciding factor.
I understand the logical reasoning that lead to this decision. The argument is that it would be inhumane to deny the vaccine just to continue the study.
The counterargument is that COVID is an extremely mild and easily treatment disease in the vast majority of cases. The vast majority of the harm is in the social panic, not the disease.
And now, if the vaccine itself causes harm, it will be that much more difficult to find out.
This wouldn't swing the election by itself, but it's pretty close to it, and we're talking thousands of votes. It should be investigated, and whatever went wrong either prosecuted or fixed.
AZ audit report likely released to the public this week
For those who were expecting it Friday, they presumably delivered a preliminary report to the Senate, which has said it will check it over and then release it.
The ballot envelope images should allow for signature verification of the ballot envelopes, which will tell us how many of those ballots would have been rejected if the normal rules had been followed.
Some other interesting information has come out. Jovan Pulitzer revealed his forensic process is looking for printer identification codes. Unlike ballot watermarks, which may or may not exist, the printer identification codes do; they aren't well known but occasionally show up in the news. I don't know enough of the details to say if they will allow invalid ballots to be detected, but if the codes can be read, the vast majority should be identified as being from a single major printer, I would expect.
It will be interesting to see what can be learned.
So, these troops who will be going door to door making sure people are at home?
They're inevitably going to be spreading the disease across all of those homes. They get it from someone on their route, incubate for a day or two, and then start spreading it to everyone whose doors they knock on later.
This is a colossal failure of policy for containing a disease.
For spreading it? Less so.
And it's perfect to take another big step towards totalitarianism by using the military to enforce a total lockdown of society.
Fauci email redactions prove collaboration with Wuhan Lab
The following passage is directly from one of Fauci's emails. The passage was improperly redacted before being released by the government agency. Two Senators obtained the redacted portion and released it today in a letter.
Fauci has been desperately trying to cover up the fact that he was funding the research that produced this virus.
Biden Admin released COVID-positive illegal aliens in Texas
Given the official Biden administration panic level about COVID, this can only be viewed as a deliberate attempt to spread COVID in Texas (and likely other red states).
I'm not personally worried about COVID much, but if we know these people are sick, and we know they are here illegally, why are we turning them loose to infect other people? Why not send them back?
There's a lot waiting on the Maricopa County audit
This is pretty much where I am at. (Well, I think 13-20 states is a pipe dream, but we may get the important 6 plus a few others). The path to a peaceful resolution is an audit, which either proves or disproves systemic fraud. If there's no fraud we go home. If there is, we address it in 2022 and 2024 with state legislatures passing election security legislation.
If fraud is demonstrated and then not properly addressed (and the 2022, 2024 votes ALSO audited to verify much reduced fraud)... that becomes a problem for which I do not currently have a solution.
This claim is thoroughly debunked. In fact, you may recognize it from Obama's first term, when it was called Operation Fast and Furious. In that "operation", Obama's DoJ under Eric Holder deliberately allowed drug cartels to make straw purchases in the US (even going to far as forcing dealers to approve sales they wanted to refuse), hoping that the guns would be used to commit murders in Mexico and be traced back to the US.
I'm amazed that they think they will get farther with the same old crap the second time. But then, it's not like Biden is going to be coming with any new ideas.
Note the charges. "Violating foreign lobbying laws" is the catch-all charge that the FBI uses to spy on people they want to spy on. And after that the charges are obstructing justice -- meaning he made the FBI's illegal spying harder somehow -- and making false statements -- meaning he didn't say what the FBI wanted him to say.
These charges are, in other words, completely bullshit, fabricated out of thin air because Barrack (and what a coincidence that name is) wouldn't cooperate in the FBI's witch hunt against Trump.