Major tech companies snooping on email contents

This doesn't surprise me:

Cyber-security company High-Tech Bridge set out to test the confidentiality of 50 of the biggest internet companies by using their systems to send a unique web address in private messages. Experts at its Geneva HQ then waited to see which companies clicked on the website.

We are most likely talking about automated link scanners, checking the links in emails for viruses designed to attack people clicking on the link, and in google's case, likely indexing the link for their search engine.

Whether that's good or bad is up to the reader to decide. I would be very surprised if an actual human is looking at those links, but having a link you send in private email to a gmail address suddenly be publicly indexed could be very surprising. If the data found at the link is associated with the people sending and receiving the email for advertising purposes, that could also be awkward.

It's one reason I don't use gmail.

On the other hand, any ISP that provides any type of spam protection -- which is pretty much all of them -- will be doing some sort of automated content analysis on your email to determine whether incoming email is spam or a message you actually want. Many of those include link checking. The difference is, Google is likely using that data for advertising, which implies storing it and associating it with your identity.

Not to mention, the admins will be able to look at the contents of your email unless there are pretty extensive technical measures taken to prevent it, and that applies to any email provider that isn't you personally. The vast majority of email providers aren't taking those measures.

Wed Sep 04 04:07:54 CDT 2013 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

Oppose the NFA rule change: Day of Reckoning

Get your opposition on record:

In effort to assist the NFA community, FICG has prepared several sample letters to be submitted to your State and Federal Representatives, as well as a sample letter for Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to submit to the US Small Business Administration. While you may believe this is strictly a federal issue, since it involves the National Firearms Act, as amended, the reality is that, if passed, this will result in a massive impact on state CLEOs, which will now have to review multiple applications for making or transferring an NFA firearm, as each RP of the fictitious entity will be required to obtain his/her CLEO’s signature. Therefore, all state legislatures must be informed and aware of the impact on their state from this proposed rule.

This rules change makes things worse, not better.

Tue Sep 03 18:33:55 CDT 2013 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

More details about DEA surveilance

Call records available all the way back to 1987 with only an administrative subpeona (no warrant or judge required). It does at least appear that this requires a specific request rather than a general, searchable dragnet, but it is still far short of a warrant and we've seen how easily police can screw up a warrant for a SWAT raid,

Tue Sep 03 18:32:27 CDT 2013 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

More cameras, less abuse

Reason argues that police should be required to wear video cameras whenever interacting with the public. It's a good idea.

Tue Sep 03 13:35:10 CDT 2013 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

<-- Prev

Subscribe to Atom Feed

I am not a lawyer, and nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice.

This site is run on custom blog software and is being actively developed. Please be forgiving of errors.

This website is an Amazon affiliate and will receive financial compensation for products purchased from Amazon through links on this site.