Ghost voting on Texas taxes...
Even in Texas, the press is liberal. How can you
tell? Just look at this story surrounding a recent tax vote in
the Texas House. Here's what happened:
Faced with this account, what story do you write? You can write about how two Democratic members of the House voted without actually being present, one of them violating their pairing agreement with the fraudulent vote. This practice is known as ghost voting, and in my opinion is legislative fraud. Legislators must be present to vote. It's their job. Or, you can write about how a Republican violated the pairing agreement, and scrupulously avoid even implying the obvious -- that the Democrat who was not present had already violated the agreement by voting fraudulently. The Republican leadership claims that the agreement is non-binding regardless. Obviously, it's not exactly honorable to violate the agreement -- for either side. (My understanding of this practice is that it is usually used when both legislators plan to be absent, thus rendering violations impossible.) But seriously, folks. Which is more important -- a legislator who is present deciding to vote, or two legislators who are not present voting fraudulently, including the Democratic representative with the pairing agreement? |
Check the groups below and enter your email address to receive updates by email:
The trackback URL for this entry is: http://triggerfinger.org/weblog/servlet/trackback/6618
No trackbacks have been posted so far.
No comments have been posted so far.
