TriggerFinger






BlogRoll

From the Barrel of a Gun
Lurking Rhythmically
Random Nuclear Strikes
Daily Pundit
Borepatch
Only Guns and Money
Mostly Cajun
Massad Ayoob
The View From North Central Idaho
Armed and Dangerous
Hell in a Handbasket
View From The Porch
Patterico
Guns, Cars, and Tech
Alphecca
Legal Insurrection
Irons in the Fire
Volokh Conspiracy
Snowflakes in Hell
Shot in the Dark
MArooned
Power Line
Michael Bane
Reason
The Smallest Minority
Publicola
Sharp as a Marble
The Silicon Greybeard
3 boxes of BS
Saysuncle
Alphecca
Of Arms and the Law
Bacon, Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, Explosives
Infodancer
Speculative Fiction
GunBlogBlackList
John Lott
Confiscation
IRS Scandal
Monster Hunter Nation
Right to the Armed

Most Popular

Featured Posts


Subscribe to Atom Feed

Tweets by @TriggerBlog


Make Custom Gifts at CafePress

Categories

FeedBoomershoot 2008 
FeedPolice Abuse 
FeedBoomershoot 2009 
Feed1st Amendment 
FeedCapital of the Free World 
FeedIllegal Mayors 
FeedBorder Control 
FeedFirearms 
FeedJury Nullification 
FeedHeller 
FeedCivil Rights 
FeedChicago Gun Case 
FeedWaco 
FeedParker 
FeedBenghazi 
FeedProperty Rights 
FeedAffirmative Action 
FeedZero Tolerance 
FeedSupreme Court 
FeedGeorge W Bush 
FeedVictimization Period 
FeedFalse-Flag Ops 
FeedConcealed Carry 
FeedSocial Security 
FeedConfiscation 
FeedGun Buy-Back 
FeedLibertarian Party 
FeedINDUCE Act 
FeedFree Speech 
FeedConstitution 
FeedArms Control 
FeedAssault Weapons 
FeedAtkins 
FeedDrug War 
FeedBudgetary Insanity 
FeedGoverningByConsent 
Feed2008 Elections 
FeedGilmore v Gonzales 
FeedBoomershoot 
FeedRegistration 
FeedTerrorism 
FeedImmigration 
FeedStand Your Ground 
FeedKonie v LA 
FeedLawsuits 
FeedBeretta 
FeedGovernment 
FeedMillion Mom March 
FeedFair Trial 
FeedBATF 
FeedEconomics 
FeedPrivacy 
FeedTrigger Locks 
FeedActivism 
Feed4th Amendment 
FeedAir Travel 
FeedSelf-Defense 
FeedCurrency 
FeedSamuel Alito 
Feed.50 Caliber Rifles 
FeedMiller 
FeedCampaign Finance 
Feed2004 Elections 
FeedEnvironment 
FeedLegal Filings 
FeedGun Show Loophole 
FeedThe Case of the .50-Caliber Felony 
FeedBean 
FeedAnti-Gun 
FeedCryptography 
FeedTaxation 
FeedCopyright 
FeedWiretaps 
FeedFast and Furious 
FeedEminent Domain 
FeedS1805 
FeedLiberty 
FeedMicrostamping 
FeedSchool Shootings 
FeedSurveillance 
FeedDMCA 
FeedCourt Rulings 
FeedHandguns 
FeedWesley Clark 
FeedDefensive Gun Use 
FeedMcDonald v Chicago 
FeedBrady 
FeedMedia Bias 
FeedHomeschooling 
FeedEmerson 
FeedRuby Ridge 
FeedRFID 
FeedSoftware Patents 
FeedRepublican Party 
FeedSeegars 
FeedBan 
FeedSilveira 
FeedIntellectual Property 
FeedArming America 
FeedMichael Badnarik 
FeedIRS Scandal 
FeedMilitia 
FeedPatriot Act 
FeedCAPPS-II 
FeedBackground checks 
Feed5th Amendment 
FeedEducation 
FeedArmed-Pilots 
FeedBallistic Fingerprinting 
Feed2nd Amendment 
FeedHiibel Case 
FeedFair Elections 
FeedSmart Guns 

California giving drivers' licenses to illegal aliens

Why do Democrats want illegal aliens to have drivers' licenses so badly?

Brown has made California a sanctuary state by signing the Trust Act, giving driver's licenses to illegal immigrants. He has also expanded financial aid to illegal immigrants by signing the California DREAM Act. Nieto reportedly thanked state officials for embracing foreigners, citing measures that extend state benefits to immigrants.

Because if you have a drivers' license in California, you can move to another state and get a new driver's license from that state pretty easily -- at least that was my experience. And if the state you move into happens to be a red state with a voter id law, well, you can probably vote with your new ID. Not legally, no, but how many states are diligent about cleaning their voter lists of non-citizens with drivers' licenses who check the box on their voter registration form that says they are citizens?

I'm betting very few if not none.

2014-08-28 15:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

Obama Admin claims no new backups disclosed

I reported earlier that Judicial Watch had been told by a DoJ lawyer that Lerner's emails were recoverable from backup tapes, but that doing so would be "too onerous" for an FOIA request.

This would obviously be a bombshell revelation, and was reported as such.

The administration's side of the story is that the backup tapes referred to are those that have been previously reported as being recycled every six months:

The official said DOJ lawyers were only referring to tapes backing up IRS emails that were routinely recycled twice a year before 2013, when the investigation into the Tea Party controversy began.

“There is no newly divulged back-up system that was not previously known about,” the official said. “Government lawyers were simply referring to the back-up system at the IRS that Commissioner Koskinen had already disclosed.”

Problem: "onerous" is a word that means "difficult and unpleasant work", not "impossible" work. The task may be "onerous", but it can still be completed. If you are a lawyer defending the IRS in this situation, and want to retain even a shred of a good reputation, you need to be very careful in what you say. Top officials at the IRS ahve previously testified that these backup tapes didn't exist; then they had been recycled; then they had been written over with new data... and now, well, "they are too onerous to search" is another change. What was once impossible has now become merely difficult and annoying and likely to be embarrassing.

I won't deny that restoring from a data recovery system backup will be a significant task, possibly even an onerous one. But that's why we have backup systems. And if restoring from those backups is possible -- even if difficult -- now, it was surely possible when Koskinen, Kane, and others testified that the emails were lost permanently.

To put it another way, a federal agency does not get to tell Congress what the agency will provide in response to a subpoena. Congress issues, and the agency must comply. No matter how onerous.

At this point, we need someone outside the executive branch to take physical possession of the backup tapes and apply whatever possible techniques they can to recover them. Spend millions if necessary. Billions is not unreasonable. Come back for more when you run out. Take the money from the IRS budget for Star Trek videos, bonuses and IT services they clearly aren't using.

2014-08-28 14:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

Patterico reacts to Lerner's destroyed Blackberry

His reaction, summarized? "Convene a grand jury, please." Being employed as a prosecutor in California (though speaking as a private citizen blogger rather than in an official capacity), he knows when grand juries are appropriate.

2014-08-28 13:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

Can the police seize your house over $40 of drugs?

Don't bet your house they can't, because they can and they will. And remember, they aren't charging you with anything. They are charging your house. Your house does not have due process rights.

2014-08-28 12:44:35.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

Speaking of media bias...

... in a report on a local school district allowing trained teachers to carry firearms (and posting signs advertising that decision):

guns blazing...pack heat...shoots straight...the long arm of the law...Gun-toting teachers

Sigh.

I fully support school districts that allow teachers to do this. I am less sure about the wisdom of posting signs advertising it. If nothing else, it invites political controversy over an issue that could be handled with a quiet change of law.

Come to think of it, perhaps "inviting political controversy" is why the school district put up the signs. The people in charge of the school district are likely less gun-friendly than the legislators.

2014-08-28 11:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

DOT rules proposal requires vehicles to broadcast location, direction, and speed

Are the possible safety benefits from such transmission worth the fact that the police will be able to issue speeding tickets with a radio on the side of the road and absolutely no human involvement? Or simply automatically track who is near a particular point?

I promise you this will be a privacy nightmare. When you enable automated data collection, you change the whole game.

2014-08-28 10:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

IRS attorney in ethics office accused of lying

This isn't directly related to the targeting scandal, as far as I can tell, but when one of your lawyers working in your ethics office faces disbarment -- for the layfolk, that's losing your license to practice law -- over misuse of client funds from before the IRS hired her... well, you start to wonder about how committed to honesty and ethical behavior the agency is.

UPDATE: More details about the case.

2014-08-28 09:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

What exactly does metadata mean, anyway?

I've already discussed how it means that the NSA will scan the content of your emails for key words. But the NSA apparently considers your cell phone location data to be "metadata" it can access without a warrant, too.

The big issue is again what the heck we mean by "metadata." NSA officials and defenders have been downplaying the word ever since Snowden's leaks began, trying to convince us all it's just basic, non-private info. But one of the documents The Intercept has published shows that the NSA has added 25 additional forms of "metadata" past what used to be traditionally accepted: phone numbers called, what time and what length of calls and the like. The new description of metadata includes everything from unique cellphone codes, passport and flight records, visa application records, and cellphone location data.

To the NSA, metadata means "We don't need a warrant" and that's about it.

And then there's the question as to whether this massive expansion in metadata gathering is being used not to fight terrorists but to help secure domestic crime convictions through "parallel construction" processes, secretly sharing this info with local law enforcement agencies

After 9-11, Congress passed the Patriot Act (the first of many such pieces of security legislation) with the promise that it would only be used against terrorists. Rather than keep that promise, they lied to courts, judges, and the people.

2014-08-27 12:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

Privacy? What privacy?

Court documents allege the officers then used a police-issued computer to look up the women they found appealing in a confidential law enforcement database that connects to the DMV and state and federal records.

They "could" face felony charges, but I will believe that when I actually see the indictments.

2014-08-27 11:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

Once is coincidence...

With incredible disregard for the law and the Congressional inquiry, the IRS admits that this Blackberry “was removed or wiped clean of any sensitive or proprietary information and removed as scrap for disposal in June 2012.” This is a year after her hard drive “crash” and months after the Congressional inquiry began.

We have a huge number of unlikely coincidences piling up. Lerner is notified of a Congressional investigation via Rep Camp's letter of inquiry; almost immediately her hard drive crashes, destroying her email archives for over two years. The hard drive containing those emails cannot be repaired, though data recovery experts suggest that perhaps it should have been recoverable. That crash happened within two weeks of Camp's letter.

Thus far, we're only into the realm of the unfortunate and unlikely. But it gets better.

(Read More...)

2014-08-27 10:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

IRS conflict of interest

House Republicans charged the IRS with a conflict of interest on Monday, insisting that a government lawyer that represented the agency previously took part in the IRS’s improper scrutiny of conservative groups.

GOP investigators have found emails from the lawyer in question showing he received at least one of the "Be On The Lookout" emails concerning the Tea Party. The conflict of interest, on the other hand, was big enough to force that lawyer to be removed from the case.

It's useful to remember that the IRS has been represented in the Z Street case by a lawyer who may well have been personally involved in the scandal, and would have a motive to defend himself by hiding evidence rather than defend the agency and the public by exposing the truth.

Similarly, the person handling DoJ's response to Congressional Oversight on the IRS matter appears to be friends with Lerner and a political activist for Democrats:

The Chairmen also expressed concern in their letter that Nicole Siegel, current employee of the Office of Legislative Affairs, which is charged with the Department’s response to congressional oversight of the Department’s interactions with Lerner and the IRS, appeared to have maintained a close relationship with Lerner and previously worked for a political action committee to assist political fundraising for Democratic candidates.

That's troubling on both counts. An honest investigation would not be riddled with conflicts of interest. That this investigation has practically every significant figure compromised in at least one way suggests that it is closer to a cover-up than an investigation.

This is on top of the inherent conflict of interest in the Department of Justice investigating conduct that the DOJ itself was directing. Remember that the DoJ requested the list of tax-exempt organizations from Lerner; it says now that the DoJ did nothing with those files for years, but why did it request them and who instructed the DoJ employee who made the request to do so? That information has yet to be released.

The DOJ also appointed a Obama donor to run its investigation of the IRS.

Investigative Reporter Sharyl Attkisson has more.

2014-08-27 09:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

Another small step in the right direction

The Volokh Conspirecy has details about a 2nd Amendment ruling striking down a law banning guns in places that sell alcohol.

It's probably important to note that this doesn't do anything about laws banning the consumption of alcohol while armed. That remains a bad idea, and possibly (depending on your jurisdiction) against the law. This decision is be focused on things like parking lots, gas stations, and grocery shopping, and dicta in the decision appears to indicate appeal is unlikely.

It's also interesting that the law that was struck down tries to create a consent to search merely by entering any place where alcohol is sold or consumed. That's probably unconstitutional on entirely separate grounds.

2014-08-26 17:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

Three steps to bringing police accountability back

This attitude is more dangerous than a Bradley, and the main danger of giving police military equipment isn't that they'll be well-armed, but that it fosters a war-zone mindset. The notion of unaccountable power is what does the real harm. A recent Washington Post column by an LAPD officer saying "If you don't want to get shot, Tased, pepper-sprayed, struck with a baton or thrown to the ground, just do what I tell you," illustrates the problem.

Read the whole thing.

2014-08-26 16:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

I was wondering when this would come up

So, the American people appear to have thought over the issue and decided that terrorists are no longer sufficient justification for the government to violate the constitution's 4th Amendment by spying on everyone. The government, having absolutely no intention of stopping the spying, went in search of a new justification, and now they will start floating trial balloons.

Today's trial balloon is Ebola.

Dear NSA: The answer is still no.

At risk of trivializing the issue, I'm tired of the NSA raping my cellphone.

2014-08-26 15:44:35.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

Fox News interviews Judicial Watch about IRS emails

2014-08-26 14:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

FedGov to create twitter hate speech and misinformation database

The National Science Foundation is financing the creation of a web service that will monitor “suspicious memes” and what it considers “false and misleading ideas,” with a major focus on political activity online.

Note that they are specifically focusing on political activity.

I'm not sure that this is illegal -- perhaps through a chilling effect argument? -- but it is for damn sure scary.

And yeah, you can insert that up your database and SQL it around for a while.

2014-08-26 13:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

This is not going to end well

A new group calling itself the Huey P. Newton Gun Club launched armed self-defense patrols Wednesday with one stated purpose: to protect Dallas neighbors from police.

The problem is, these people are not reacting to a real problem of racism -- they are reacting to political incitement by Democrats desperate to boost black turnout in the midterm elections and preserve control of the Senate.

I won't argue that people of all races have the right to bear arms in self-defense. And, yes, that includes the police when it is necessary. But is it necessary?

The open-carry march with rifles is fine. I don't think this part of the story is necessary or safe:

At one point, the march went to Elaine's Restaurant on Martin Luther King Boulevard, where demonstrators piled rifles on tables as they ordered cold drinks and food.

Piled rifles on tables? Maybe that's just the reporter's choice of words. But honestly, it's interesting to see how the narrative shifts when the Left is doing this rather than the Right, isn't it?

The Dallas police get a compliment:

A Dallas police lieutenant and deputy chief were eating lunch in the restaurant at the time. They politely spoke to the demonstrators as they paid their bills. Chief David Brown issued a statement saying, "the Dallas Police Department supports the constitutional rights of all."

That's the right way to handle this situation. If the Dallas police are able to maintain their calm and respond in this entirely appropriate manner, I don't think there is a real epidemic of "police terror" in Dallas to worry about.

Most of my mixed feelings about this situation come from this part:

"We believe we can police ourselves and bring security to our community, ridding our community of black-on-black crime, violence, police terror, etc., etc.," Freeman said. Huey P. Newton Gun Club organizers hope neighbors will take up arms and join future patrols.

Armed inner-city patrols with a chip on their shoulder about "police terror"? That's a powder keg waiting for a match. And there are lots of "helpful" politicians with matches.

2014-08-26 12:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

A refresher course on Democrat lawfare

Lawfare has been an ongoing tool of the Democrat party in attacking Republicans, of which the indictment of Rick Perry for using his line-item veto power as Governor of Texas is only the latest example. There are others:

  1. Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison

  2. Jack Ryan (Illinois Senate race in 2004 that launched Obama)

  3. Rep Tom Delay

  4. Senator Ted Stevens

  5. Governor Sarah Palin

  6. Governor Scott Walker

  7. Governor Chris Christie

  8. Governor Rick Perry


2014-08-26 11:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

Racism!

IF HE WERE A REPUBLICAN, THIS WOULD LEAD THE NEWS: Reid apologizes for Asian jokes. You do have to wonder, though, what with the quotas under affirmative action, and the ethnic jokes, whether the Democrats really like Asians much.

Harry Reid is a racist Democrat. He's called Republicans racists for far less.

2014-08-26 10:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

Obama Administration has something to hide on the illegal alien problem

To date, Grassley says his questions to HHS have gone unanswered. Among other queries, he asked for information about who the unaccompanied minors are being released to, the health issues facing the unaccompanied minors, and the decision to move millions of dollars away from service for legal refugees.

On June 25, Grassley requested HHS provide information on its contracts related to handling of the illegal immigrant children. That request, he says, went unanswered. He reiterated it in a letter on July 17, which specifically asked about non-profit BCFS.

It has been over six weeks since the initial request for information and over one month since the previous letter was sent. I have received neither answers nor responsive documents.

It's not clear what exactly they are hiding, but that's the point of trying to hide things.

2014-08-26 09:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

Obama Admin claims it is not subject to the rule of law

They are claiming that the "constitutional responsibility to protect the lives of Americans" somehow trumps the specific laws prohibiting use of funds for prisoner transfers without 30 days notice to Congress.

They don't cite any specific constitutional language to support their claim, because there is none. The rule of law requires that everyone, including the President, follow the law. While there are some areas where the President has authority derived from the Constitution, the power of the purse rests with Congress.

And let's get fucking serious here. Obama did not notify Congress, as required by law, because he feared Congress would block the deal and possibly wanted to avoid paying a political cost. That's how little the rule of law means to the President; he'll ignore the law to avoid political inconvenience.

2014-08-25 18:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

Foley rescue op delayed by Obama for 30 days

Anthony Shaffer, a former lieutenant-colonel in US military intelligence who worked on covert operations, said: “I’m told it was almost a 30-day delay from when they said they wanted to go to when he finally gave the green light. They were ready to go in June to grab the guy [Foley] and they weren’t permitted.”

When seconds count, the Obama Administration is only 30 days away.

I wasn't about to criticize the Obama Admin for trying to rescue Foley and failing. Attempting the rescue is the right thing to do if it's feasible, and any military operation has a chance of failure. But when it fails arguably because of a delay imposed by the political decision makers, and when the failure is due to a full month between the military giving the ready-for-mission and the decision to actually launch the mission... well, that's worthy of criticism.

2014-08-25 17:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

IRS BOMBSHELL: Lerner emails still exist on disaster recovery backups

It's now Monday, August 25th, 2014. The IRS was ordered to provide additional information to the court in a Judicial Watch case seeking information about the Tea Party political targeting and efforts to recover Lois Lerner's missing emails. The deadline for that filing, which was to detail IRS efforts to recover Lerner's emails from sources other than her failed hard drive (email servers, alternate devices, home email accounts, etc), was Friday, August 22nd.

Judicial Watch is now reporting that Department of Justice attorneys are admitting that Lerner's emails still exist:

Department of Justice attorneys for the Internal Revenue Service told Judicial Watch on Friday that Lois Lerner’s emails, indeed all government computer records, are backed up by the federal government in case of a government-wide catastrophe. The Obama administration attorneys said that this back-up system would be too onerous to search. The DOJ attorneys also acknowledged that the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) is investigating this back-up system.

We obviously disagree that disclosing the emails as required would be onerous, and plan to raise this new development with Judge Sullivan.

This is a jaw-dropping revelation. The Obama administration had been lying to the American people about Lois Lerner’s missing emails. There are no “missing” Lois Lerner emails – nor missing emails of any of the other top IRS or other government officials whose emails seem to be disappearing at increasingly alarming rate. All the focus on missing hard drives has been a diversion. The Obama administration has known all along where the email records could be – but dishonestly withheld this information. You can bet we are going to ask the court for immediate assistance in cutting through this massive obstruction of justice.

Yes, recovering an entire email server from crash recovery backup tapes is time-consuming and potentially expensive. But what use are backup tapes if you don't use them?

More to the point, this is an open admission that the IRS has been refusing to turn over the Lerner emails rather than unable to turn them over.

I may have more to say once I have read the sworn statements for myself.

UPDATE: Comments on sworn statements below the fold. National Review Online is now reporting:

“A Department of Justice attorney told a Judicial Watch attorney on Friday that it turns out the federal government backs up all computer records in case something terrible happens in Washington and there’s a catastrophe, so the government can continue operating,” Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton told Fox News’s Shannon Bream.

“But it would be too hard to go get Lois Lerner’s e-mails from that backup system,” Fitton continued, paraphrasing the DOJ official. “So, everything we’ve been hearing about scratched hard drives, about missing e-mails of Lois Lerner, other IRS officials, other officials in the Obama administration, it’s all been a pack of malarkey. They could get these records, but they don’t want to.”

Backup systems are meant to be used. If you don't use the system to recover data when you need to, why have it at all?

(Read More...)

2014-08-25 16:54:02.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

Good advice for Libertarians on foreign policy

The philosophy of liberty is focused primarily on domestic policy. What happens in other nations is mostly an afterthought, something that is hand waved away more than actually discussed. If Libertarians are to be taken seriously as a party, that's going to have to change. Libertarians need to present a realistic vision of how our policies can protect Americans from external threats as well as internal ones.

A Libertarian party that allows anyone to cross the border, regardless of their identity and affiliation with criminals and terrorists, will not be trusted.

A Libertarian party that allows terrorists to take and hold territory, as ISIS has done, and use it as a launching pad for funding and carrying out attacks against the United States should not be trusted.

There are dangers in entangling alliances and preemptive strikes, yes. There are dangers no less powerful in waiting to be attacked.

2014-08-25 16:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

California waiting period law ruled unconstitutional

Sebastian is reporting that we won Sylvester v Harris, which invalidates waiting periods as applied to those who pass a background check before the end of the waiting period, if they already have an additional firearm (confirmed by checking the California gun registry apparently) or a valid CCW/COE.

Note that this does not appear to do anything about people buying a gun for the first time in California, even if they pass the background check and already own a gun. It's only for people who the state can verify already owns a gun.

Small steps. Each time we foreclose one of the gun-control planks through the courts, they have to go back to the legislative drawing board.

2014-08-25 16:28:13.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

Pros and Cons of Impeaching Lerner

My first impression on encountering the idea was why bother? Lerner herself has already resigned in disgrace retired with full benefits, and having done that, she can't be removed from office a second time. Most of the senior figures that we know to have been involved have either resigned or retired or otherwise moved on, too, though a few are still around (including in at least one case, serving within the White House). But the impeachment process can, upon conviction, impose a ban on serving in federal office in the future. Lerner herself might not have further political ambitions but perhaps the others who might also be impeached do.

On the other hand, the Senate is still firmly in Democrat control. They can probably find 35 votes in safe Senate seats to agree with the idea that the dog ate Lerner's email, especially since if they don't protect her she will start talking; and exonerating her in the Senate would be a far worse outcome than a persistent cloud over the whole scandal.

The appropriate time for impeaching Lerner was as soon after she pled the 5th as possible. If the politics of the situation made a conviction impossible under those circumstances, it will be that much more difficult with her no longer in office and with little direct evidence, never mind how that lack of evidence is itself suspicious.

2014-08-25 15:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

If Global Warming is real, why do people have to fake the records?

The [Australian] Bureau of Meteorology has been accused of manipulating historic temperature records to fit a predetermined view of global warming. Researcher Jennifer Marohasy claims the adjusted records resemble “propaganda” rather than science. Dr Marohasy has analysed the raw data from dozens of locations across Australia and matched it against the new data used by BOM showing that temperatures were progressively warming. In many cases, Dr Marohasy said, temperature trends had changed from slight cooling to dramatic warming over 100 years.

The language is a little unclear, so I will clarify: Marohasy is saying that the adjustments to recorded temperatures changed the trend from a slight cooling trend to a dramatic warming trend. The adjustments are added by humans, supposedly to compensate for flaws in the raw measurements. It now seems clear that in Australia, those adjustments are done in support of a political cause rather than accurate data.

Australia is far from the first nation to have problems. To the best of my knowledge, every other major collection of temperature records has had similar issues. The common thread appears to be "scientists" who are more interested in promoting the cause of global warming in order to create political support for their Luddite agenda than in actually doing science.

To put it bluntly, scientists who care about being right don't need to torture the data until it confesses to whatever they want.

2014-08-25 14:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

Moms Demanding Action escalates from vandalism to SWATing

Details over at Bearing Arms.

Just to make it clear: if you see someone with a holstered firearm peacefully going about their normal business, there is no reason to panic. If you do panic, you are suffering from hoplophobia -- excessive and irrational fear of weapons. If your fear causes you to abandon a shopping cart filled with perishable food on your way to run out the door, the place you were shopping is likely to forgive you for causing them a little extra labor. But if you premeditated the action -- such as would be indicated by posting on Twitter about it, or abandoning shopping carts frequently -- they might not be so forgiving.

Calling the police and reporting a robbery in progress because you saw someone with a holstered firearm peacefully shopping is going to get very ugly, very fast. Doing that puts lives at risk. It's certainly not a good way to reduce gun violence, because the person with the holster gun was causing no violence, but when the police show up primed by a false call about an armed robbery in progress, the violence that is very likely to result in that situation is entirely the fault of the person who called in the false report.

Moms Demand Action may claim to be about reducing gun violence, but some of their members seem quite happy to get gun owners killed.

2014-08-25 13:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

SWAT Teams and Umbrellas

Some people have been pointing at the riots and looting in Ferguson as justification for small town police forces to have SWAT teams and military vehicles. There's some value to that; riots and looting are in fact a situation where specialized gear and an armored vehicle might be useful. However, for every Ferguson, there are many more teachers with umbrellas.

2014-08-25 12:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

Government agencies are blacklisting journalists

“[A] study released earlier this month revealed that many government information officers block specific journalists they don’t like from accessing information. The news comes as 47 federal inspectors general sent a letter to lawmakers criticizing “serious limitations on access to records” that they say have “impeded” their oversight work. –Sirota

The government should not get to play favorites.

2014-08-25 11:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

White House political office documents subpoena'd

The House Oversight Committee today issued a subpoena to the White House for documents involving the White House political office, which reopened after two members of President Obama’s cabinet were found to have violated laws intended to separate taxpayer functions from partisan political efforts. The cabinet members were Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and Labor Department Secretary Hilda Solis.

This scandal has yet to really break, but if the practices that allegedly took place occurred on a widespread scale, it could be fairly serious.

2014-08-25 10:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

A documentary about IRS abuse to be in theaters

2014-08-25 09:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

Bruce Schneier calls for breaking up the NSA

By treating the Internet as a giant surveillance platform, the NSA has betrayed the Internet and the world. It has subverted the products, protocols, and standards that we use to protect ourselves. It has left us all vulnerable—to foreign governments, to cybercriminals, to hackers. And it has transformed the Internet into a medium that no one can trust.

He wants to put computer-based offensive capabilities into the Department of Defense, law enforcement into the Department of Justice (and there subject to warrant process, etc) and defensive measures designed to increase our own security into a new agency. It makes sense to me, but we can't just split things up -- we have to make sure that the new divisions actually behave appropriately, with oversight and accountability.

2014-08-22 15:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

More gun control legislation in California

Read the details. If you live there, it's almost too late -- make your voice heard while you still can.

UPDATE: Looks like the legislature passed two bills.

2014-08-22 14:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

GAO says Bergdahl prisoner swap broke the law

It's not news-news; it's news that the GAO has performed a comprehensive analysis of the Bergdahl prisoner swap and determined that, yes, the law really was violated, and helpfully includes the penalties for doing so.

Of course, since the person responsible for prosecuting the charges is an Obama appointee, nothing will be done.

2014-08-22 13:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

DC to appeal gun carry ruling while giving police assault weapons

Oh, look, it's Emily Miller reporting on her old issues from her new beat!

"The whole issue of the public carrying of a firearm is very complicated," Mendelson said. "And I believe the executive and the attorney general will continue with the appeal."

It's actually very simple -- the 50 states all have rules allowing carry by some mechanism. None of those states have had systemic problems with people carrying guns lawfully. It's the people who ignore the law and carry anyway that cause problems.

Also this week, the city asked the court for six more months to rewrite its gun laws. Right now, the city has until October 22. That's why Mendelson said gun carry will be at the top of the agenda when the city council returns from recess.

Top of the agenda after recess, sure. Delay as long as possible.

And while they delay, they are buying hundreds of new "assault weapons" for their police force. Of course, when the police have them, they are called modern rifles, but one key feature is the adjustable stock:

According to Colt, the Metropolitan Police Department bought the model LE6920 rifles in February. They are 5.56 caliber and can only fire semi-auto. The new Colt rifle which the Metropolitan Police Department bought is based on the M4. It has a collapsible stock so you can adjust it to your size. And a rather key feature is the barrel, which at 16.1 inches, is four inches shorter than their current rifles, which was relevant as they were going around close quarters and cubicles at the Navy Yard.

The M4 is the modern military version of the M16. Why do police need military weapons? The original assault weapons ban covered semiautomatic rifles with folding stocks essentially identical to these. Dianne Feinstein's proposed assault weapon ban of 2013 would ban rifles with adjustable stocks:

All semiautomatic rifles that can accept a detachable magazine and have at least one military feature: pistol grip; forward grip; folding, telescoping, or detachable stock; grenade launcher or rocket launcher; barrel shroud; or threaded barrel.

So why do police need assault weapons?

A better question is why shouldn't anyone who wants to buy a semiautomatic rifle that fits them properly and is useful in close quarters? There's nothing special about these rifles. They are useful to police for self-defense, and just as useful to ordinary citizens for self-defense.

2014-08-22 12:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

SAF working to get rid of local gun control with preemption

The Second Amendment Foundation, based in Washington state, has written to 49 local Utah governments demanding they repeal various ordinances that violate a state law reserving almost all gun-regulation power to the state Legislature. Cities still can outlaw discharging or brandishing weapons, but not possessing or carrying them.

They deserve credit for doing the legwork. Which makes me wonder -- why isn't the NRA doing this legwork? Are they just picking different targets?

2014-08-22 09:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

When bagpipes become contraband

Gotta love that "also": Every time you take a bagpipe in and out of the United States it's a $576 round-trip fee.

Demanding a CITES certificate for bagpipes is a burden upon free-born citizens. Restricting the paperwork's validity to only 28 ports of entry is an unduly onerous burden. Requiring the bagpipers to come back on the Wednesday to those 28 ports of entry because the inspector's washing her hair on the Tuesday is an even more onerous and insulting burden. And charging an American $576 to play his bagpipe in Montreal is a shakedown racket unacceptable in a free society. Tyranny starts at the edges and nibbles its way in. This bagpipe regime is tyrannous, but it will not stop there.

Read the whole thing.

It does not describe a free society.

But what can we do about it?

2014-08-21 14:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

DoJ ordered to release Fast and Furious privilege log to House Oversight

Issa's press release:

“Today a Federal judge ordered that the Department of Justice must submit by October 1 a privilege log of withheld documents related to Operation Fast and Furious. I am grateful and pleased by that. This Administration has been so intent on hiding the contents of these documents that it allowed Attorney General Holder to be held in contempt instead of just turning them over to Congress. The privilege log will bring us closer to finding out why the Justice Department hid behind false denials in the wake of reckless conduct that contributed to the violent deaths of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry and countless Mexican citizens.”

This is definitely good news, but the case is far from over. Since some people are reading it the wrong way, I will point out that a privilege log is a list of documents that one party in a lawsuit is refusing to turn over to the other party due to some sort of privilege claim. In order to make the claim of privilege valid, the party claiming privilege lists the documents they aren't going to turn over, along with a very brief description of each one, and the reason they are claiming it does not need to be turned over. The judge can then look at the list of reasons -- and sometimes the documents themselves, without showing them to the opposing party -- to rule on whether the claim of privilege is valid or not.

So, while the privilege log is an important step to challenging Holder's withholding of Fast and Furious documents, we're not likely to see the documents themselves on October 1st. On the plus side, Issa's lawyers can argue about whether he should get to see them despite Holder's claim, and it would be extremely awkward for any of those documents to go missing.



2014-08-21 13:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

Bill Whittle on Ferguson


2014-08-21 12:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

Problems with Washington State I-594

Rolf has questions that deserve answers. Or you could just vote no.

2014-08-21 11:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

Feminist Fascism

The first step is to eliminate 90% of the men. Then, raise the "perfect female children" communally in state-owned breeding centers where they will be trained to report their parents for incorrect thoughts.

The amazing thing is that people can say this sort of thing while criticizing "the patriarchy" as being a repressive dictatorship. If the patriarchy is responsible for keeping her ideas down, I'll vote for the patriarchy.

2014-08-21 10:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

I knew Fast and Furious was walking firearms to Mexico...

... I didn't realize they were also walking grenades.

2014-08-21 09:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

Good advice on the Perry indictment

Once the dust settles on the Perry indictment, the Texas legislature needs to take a long, hard look at the Public Integrity Unit in Travis County. No county government should have such sweeping jurisdiction over officials who do not live there, but who are sent there by the voters to serve the people of Texas.

I don't know to what extent the state can exercise control of the county, but it's clear that the Travis County Public Integrity Unit is out of control and needs to be reined in. Political indictments are unacceptable, and this is far from the first such indictment this office has issued.

2014-08-20 12:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

Police officers with on-body cameras still do not release footage

But while the cameras help the public by deterring officer misconduct, they're still largely tools for the departments that use them. San Diego police effectively lock any relevant videos in a vault and throw away the public's key. The footage their officers record will never show up on YouTube and go viral. Nor will it help fill in the gaps when a major crime leaves lots of unanswered questions. Crime victims or their families may never get to see and hear what the devices recorded.

This needs to end. The footage from police body cameras, with some exceptions for those undercover, needs to be public record. Justice is not served if the police can claim footage exonerates them without displaying the footage to back it up.

2014-08-20 09:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

Officer Friendly Or Else

"If you don't want to get shot, tased, pepper-sprayed, struck with a baton or thrown to the ground," warns Officer Sunil Dutta of the Los Angeles Police Department, "just do what I tell you."

Reason explains the police attitude problem.

2014-08-19 18:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

Another Illegal Mayor

This time, the charges appear to be bribery, "endangering the public health" (whatever that means), and intimidating a witness. It's getting to the point where this stuff just isn't news anymore.

2014-08-19 17:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

Deval Patrick signs gun control bill in Massachusetts

The law makes all firearms purchases, including rifles and shotguns, subject to the discretion of police rather than objective criteria. In other words, if the police don't like you you can't have a gun.

That's not how we treat fundamental rights in this country, and I suspect the Supreme Court will so rule eventually. A state like Massachusetts might be able to get away with discretion for carrying a firearm outside the home, but the Heller case should have nixed discretion for ownership.

2014-08-19 16:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

American Bar Association doesn't like Stand Your Ground

"Stand your ground" laws hinder law enforcement, are applied inconsistently and disproportionately affect minorities.

That's the conclusion of a report issued by the ABA at their annual meeting. It is, of course, quite incorrect:

The ABA contends that Stand Your Ground laws increase homicides, but the four studies it cites for that theory suffer serious limitations. The Tampa Bay Tribune, which conducted one of the studies, admitted that it reviewed only a small number of cases, thus its findings couldn’t be considered conclusive. Two of the remaining three studies used data which exclude a significant percentage of defensive homicides and which, even with respect to those that are included, don’t indicate whether a Stand Your Ground law was invoked. The fourth study used data that don’t distinguish between criminal homicides, to which such laws are irrelevant, and defensive homicides, let alone distinguish between defensive homicides in which such laws were and weren’t invoked.

It's easy to lie with statistics when your audience isn't willing to check your facts.

2014-08-19 15:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]

IRS, ObamaCare officials got large bonuses despite failure

Judicial Watch is reporting on bonuses paid to Obamacare officials despite that effort remaining a colossal failure. We have also seen IRS officials collecting huge bonuses and promotions despite being implicated in that agencies tax-exempt organizations targeting scandal. Not to mention the VA officials who also got the big bonuses for letting their patients die on off-the-books wait lists.

It makes me wonder if they were being paid off.

2014-08-19 14:44:34.0 by TriggerFinger. Comments [Tweet]
<-- Previous Next -->

If you would like to receive new posts by email:

I am not a lawyer, and nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice. this site is run on custom blog software and is being actively developed. Please be forgiving of errors.


This website is an Amazon affiliate and will receive financial compensation for products purchased from Amazon through links on this site.