From
Alphapatriot comes
this report of a man whose family
claimed he was threatening suicide
(presumably because he has been battling a life-threatening
illness). The response from the police? Invade his home,
forcibly put him into a psychiatric hospital for "evaluation",
confiscate all his firearms, and destroy his reloading supplies because
the police don't know how to store them properly. The man's
firearms and ammunition are being "held until prosecutors and the
county attorney can determine whether Wilkinson is stable enough to
have them back".
I have some questions for the government officials involved in this case:
- What happened to "innocent until proven guilty"?
- What happened to "due process of law"?
- What happened to "nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation"? Oh, never mind, Kelo v New London happened to that one.
Oh, and for anyone who was ever inclined to trust either the police or
the press, I suggest you read these two accounts about the
seizure. They ran in the same paper, on successive days:
From the first account:
Authorities seized several
assault rifles, submachine guns, ammunition
and explosives from a former Army soldier's property and said they
believed he was a threat to the community. They also found
extremist literature, including a book written and signed by Randy
Weaver, who gained fame after waging the Ruby Ridge standoff against
federal authorities in 1992, the sheriff said. The weapons seizure at
Jack Wilkerson's home was likely the largest in Delaware County
history, Sheriff George Sheridan said. Police recovered an
estimated $30,000 worth of guns, 2,000 pounds of ammunition and 436
pounds of explosives.
"We're talking mortar shells, artillery rounds, tank rounds and
projectiles," Sheridan said.
For
some reason, those "assault rifles, submachine guns, mortar shells,
artillery rounds, tank rounds, and projects" are all missing from the
followup story. Either they never existed or the police found out
they were perfectly legal to own.
The sheriff's department bomb squad spent four hours blowing up the
explosives at a shooting range Sunday but saved the ammunition in case
it would be necessary for future investigations or court proceedings,
Sheridan said.
The police bomb squad "spent
four hours blowing up the explosives", doing something that gun
enthusiasts
pay good money and travel long distances to do.
The "explosives" consisted of gunpower, used in reloading ammunition
(something many active shooters do to reduce their costs). They
were removed because the local cops didn't think it was safe to store
them near space heaters; never mind that space heaters generally aren't
operated during the summer and that the man had been reloading for
years without incident.
The man has not been charged with anything. He was "despondent"
because he might have had cancer. Seems like a good reason to be
despondent to me, and frankly, it's none of our business whether he
prefers to commit suicide rather than face a long, drawn out battle
with cancer. One of his family members asked police to "check on
him", and I bet that family member regrets making that request.
The "extremist literature" allegation is frankly embarassing, as
literature
presents no legal basis for any action or charges under the First
Amendment. Besides, the "extremist" author, Randy Weaver (see
Ruby Ridge),
had federal agents kill his wife and son in front of his eyes while
investigating him on baseless, trumped-up charges as part of an
intimidation campaign.
Smart money says that the police saved the ammunition not "in case it
would be necessary for future investigations or court proceedings", but
rather because
they might have to give it back when they find out it's perfectly legal.
Remember, folks, the police are NOT your friend. Do not ask them
to "check on" your friends or family, even if you are sincerely
concerned -- perhaps especially if you are sincerely concerned!
The family that did so in this case has made things
substantially worse for the person they were purportedly concerned about.
UPDATE:
FreedomSight has more, including
the law most likely used in this case.