The So-Called Capital of the Free World

The handout describing the registration procedure for firearms in the District of Columbia has a number of gems worthy of comment.  Consider...

From page 5:

Individuals may voluntarily surrender any firearm, ammunition, or destructive device to the Police Department and shall be immune to prosecution of any violation of this Act.  Delivery may be made to a police station or by requesting a police officer to your home or place of business to collect it.  All firearms should be unloaded and wrapped in a package; and in the case of delivery to a police facility, the package should be carried in open view.  No identification will be required of the person delivering and abandoning the firearm to the police department.

Those are the classic "gun buy back" terms, except that the government isn't offering any money for the firearms.  They do offer immunity from prosecution and complete anonymity, however.  What's wrong with this policy?  Simple: it makes it much harder to catch and convict criminals.  If you were a criminal in DC, and you had just shot someone with an illegal gun, what do you do?  If you are ever caught with that gun, it can be linked back to the murder forensically.  If you sell it to another criminal, they will tell the police who they got it from rather than face the murder charge.  But the police have a solution for criminals facing this conumdrum!  Just turn in your gun anonymously right after you use it!  No chance of getting caught with it on you, and a new gun is cheaper than a murder trial.

No person shall possess ammunition within the District unless:

1. He is a licensed dealer.
2. He is a holder of a valid registration certificate for a firearm of the same gauge or caliber as the ammunition he possesses.
3. He holds an ammunition collector's certificate as of September 24, 1976.

That's right, folks.  The District of Columbia not only expects you to register your firearms, but they won't even let you own ammunition if you don't own a firearm that can fire it!  Remember the case of Thomas Bean, who went to jail because he forgot about a box of .22s in his car?

The inanity of having an "ammunition collector's certificate" need not be elaborated upon, merely mentioned in passing.

From page 4:

Duties and Responsibilities of Registrant

1. Every registrant must notify the Chief of Police in writing immediately of the following:
   
1. Discovery of loss, theft, or destruction, of a registration certificate describing the circumstances.
2. Any change of name or address recorded on the certificate.
3. Sale, transfer, or other disposition of any firearm.

Or, in other words, once you register a firearm in the District of Columbia, you have a permanent police file there, and you must keep it updated in exactly the same manner a sex offender is required to register his location.  How's that for a chilling effect?

The registrant must have the registration certificate in his or her possession whenever in possession of the firearm, and exhibit it upon demand to a member of the Metropolitan Police Department or other law enforcement officer.

Papieren, bitte!

No firearm shall be discharged in the District of Columbia without first obtaining a special written permit from the Chief of Police authorizing the discharge.

May I please have written permission to fire at this paper target, sir? bang Please sir, may I have another?

On this, my fourth visit to the gun registration office, I planned to quickly pick up my completed and approved application. Alas, said application was not completed. I waited patiently while the office applied the necessary numbers, stamps, and embossed seals to my paperwork. On application of the 'APPROVED' stamp and city seal, the 'application' becomes the 'registration' and they provide you with three copies of same. You keep one with the firearm at all times (including during transport), and turn another over to the dealer. It is not clear what the third copy is for. None of the copies is actually marked as to its' intended recipient or purpose. Perhaps it's time to update the form? Also, the registration for the firearm serves as the registration for the ammunition, but only the ammunition of that same caliber. As a resident of DC it is forbidden for me to possess ammunition for a caliber of gun which I do not own and have registered. There is no separate process for registering ammunition. It should be noted, that at this point the officer kindly returned two of four passport photos as only two were actually required.

That evening after work, I returned to the dealer to pick up the gun. In the end, it took 54 days to get to the point where I could walk into the gun dealer and officially take delivery of the gun. If you are unemployed, you could probably get that down to 45 days. Of course, I should point out that, before being handed the gun, I had to undergo the very same instant NICS check that is sufficient for most other American citizens. So, having to wait 54 days to do what most any other citizen can accomplish in 15 minutes, what was I buying? Was I buying an 8 round semi-auto 12 gauge? No. Was I buying a Clinton tagged 'Assault Rifle'? No, the detachable magazine means Homeland Defense Rifles are banned in DC. Did I buy a .50BMG sniper rifle, of the type that has Senator Lautenbergs' panties in a bunch? No. My fellow enthusiasts: I went through bureaucratic hell, FBI fingerprinting, a full six week background investigation, and paid $72.60 in fees and other costs (plus gas and parking for all those trips to the registration office) to buy... drum roll please... a single shot hunting rifle.

Welcome to Washington DC, Capitol of the 'Free' World!

-- An Anonymous DC resident

A little before lunch, I got a call at work that my fingerprints were back from the FBI, and that my application was ready to 'go to the next step'. I politely pointed out that this was the last step and that my application should be finished and approved. The officer reviewed the contents of my file and agreed. Please note: from the time you apply to register a firearm in the District of Columbia, the police open a permanent file on you. So I asked when I could pick up the completed application, the reply was that the completed and approved registration paperwork could be picked up any time during normal office hours.

-- An Anonymous DC resident

On my third visit to the gun registration office, the plan was to submit the necessary paperwork; PD 219, and the requested four (remember, the handout says two) passport photos, and take the required written test. After getting a list of charges at the gun registration office, I waited in line at the cashier, and paid $35.00 for finger prints, and the $13.00 registration fee.

I took the test. It is 2 pages -- 1 sheet front and back. I missed one question about what the registration certificate actually entitles me to buy. In effect, going through the registration process once allows you to buy additional guns, but each must be registered in the manor of the first. The fingerprinting, and background investigation are only required the first time. The distinction between the paperwork for the purchaser and the paperwork for each individual firearm is muddy at best, and this is not explained in the Xeroxed documentation. In short, for additional purchases, I go get a form, go buy a gun, submit the form, and if the gun is acceptable to the registration office, then I can pick up the gun.

Incidentally, I requested a copy of my finished test (for the purposes of this writing), but this request was denied. No reason was offered. About the test: The test had not a single question about firearm safety. The test was purely about DC firearms laws, restrictions, and definitions. Safe handling of firearms is, seemingly, not a concern.

At this point, I thought I was done with my portion of the process. So I asked, "Do you have everything you need?" The woman said she thought so, but handed my file to the male officer who works there. He glanced though my file and said that I still needed a notarized certification of mental competence. It was difficult to maintain my gracious attitude. Such a document was never mentioned before this day. Of course, I had to explicitly ask for the appropriate form. The 'form' is just a Xeroxed sheet that you sign saying you haven't been  judged mentally incompetent in the last 5 years.  At this point I figured I would have to leave to find a notary, sign it in front of them, and get that signature notarized. In a rare moment of helpfulness, the woman said she thought her friend upstairs was a notary. She called the woman to verify. The woman came to me. I thought this was very nice, until she informed me that there was a $5.00 charge. Now, of course, any bank manager will notarize anything for free if you have an account, but I figured $5.00 was a small price to pay for not having to leave and make a return visit. The notary happily accepted cash. You can draw your own conclusions from that last fact.

Before leaving I sought to clear up some questions I had about permissible firearms. The gentleman staffing the office seemed to be well informed on the process, so I asked him. He couldn't or wouldn't resolve the differences between what he personally claimed to be banned, and what is actually covered by the law. He verbally placed a magazine capacity limit of ten rounds on semi-automatic guns, and also said that guns with 'pistol grips' would be denied. The only written limit (in the law or the handout) I can find is 12 rounds, and I can find no written reference to 'pistol grips'. Since almost any hunting rifle has what manufacturers refer to as a 'pistol' grip (the drop behind the trigger) it's pretty clear he's not so well informed. Presumably, he means any gun where the magazine is inserted through a vertical grip. How enlarged thumb holes (think Browning Buckmark rifle) are considered is an open question. One sad thing that came from the conversation was that any semi-auto even conceivably capable of handling more than 10 rounds is banned, so for instance a Ruger 10/22 is verboten, even if you only purchase it with the OEM 10 round magazine. Effectively, DC bans any semi-auto with a detachable magazine -- although the officer refused to actually say that when I pointed it out. You can draw your own conclusions as to whether the officer is clearly over-stepping his bounds. At this point I was told to expect the investigation to take 6 to 8 weeks, after which I would be approved or denied to take delivery of the gun that I already paid for.

Again, on the way out, I requested several, but was denied more than two, blank PD 219's.

Note: As of today the phone message still mentions the wrong hours, and I again mentioned this to the officers on duty.

-- An Anonymous DC resident

I called the DC firearms registration unit to check on the status of my application at 4:22pm. There was no answer. The recording still gives the wrong office hours.

-- An Anonymous DC resident

Over the next few days, I ran errands to get the required USPS money orders (2@$0.90ea. = $1.80) and the required passport photos ($17.80). I also bought a gun, although 'bought' doesn't really convey the essence of the transaction since I could not legally take delivery. I paid for a gun.

-- An Anonymous DC resident

For some time now I have been following the Seegars v Ashcroft and Parker v DC cases.  I've been following them because they are important cases to 2nd Amendment law.  Our nation's capital ignores the 2nd Amendment and purports to ban handguns entirely, while permitting long guns to be owned and possessed only in non-functional condition (disassembled or trigger-locked) with no exceptions for self-defense use.  That's enough to get anyone who believes in gun rights up in arms, and it's all that most people know about gun ownership in DC.  And for the most part, it's all they need to know; for some strange reason, gun rights folks tend not to live in DC.  (Gee, I can't imagine why...)

But just knowing the bare facts is not enough.  The sickness in DC has penetrated much deeper than that. 

I don't live in DC.  I can't give you the firsthand perspective on what it is like to be a gun owner in America's gun control paradise.  But thanks to the power of the Internet, and the kindness of strangers, I have a blogspondent who can.  Please welcome Anonymous, who brings us The So-Called Capitol of the Free World.

Since the office opens at 7am, I went to the DC firearms registration office the next morning around 8am. I walked up to the counter / half door at the firearms registration office.

The uniformed DC police officer manning the office was on the phone. I did not interrupt her. I waited quietly and patiently. After about a minute she looked up and said, "I'm on the phone." I nodded, and continued to wait. She soon looked up again, and said: "I'm on the phone with my children, please have a seat in the hall." Now, as a DC taxpayer I was rather surprised and disappointed (a polite way of saying 'pissed-off') that she would be so bold as to ask me to wait while she conducted a personal call during normal business hours while sitting at her desk in the office she was paid to staff. That said, on this day, I needed her help, so I did as instructed: I sat in the hall and waited. Eventually a different woman, dressed in civilian clothes, came out into the hall and asked me what I wanted.

I told her I was there to look into legally buying a firearm, as a resident of DC. I said I was aware that firearms had to be registered but could find no relevant information on the DC government web site. She asked me how many guns I wanted to register. I said I didn't have any guns, I was interested in buying one and wanted to know the process and costs involved. She again asked how many guns I wanted to register. I again replied that I was not there to register a gun, I don't have a gun. I would like to legally purchase a gun, and I want to know the process for registering it and how much it will cost.

She then asked how many guns I wanted to buy. Now I'd just said 'a gun' at least three times, so at this point, I was starting to feel like I was stuck in a "Who's on first" style comedy skit. I was getting nowhere, and I was getting irritated. I asked a few simple questions about the process for registering a gun and the cost of doing so, and I can't get a single answer out of this woman. So I, still very politely, replied: "Well, let's say I want to buy and