Did Feinstein pull a David Gregory?
Short answer: Yes, except that the police gave permission and actually claimed to be in possession of the weapons used in her presentation.
If the weapons were supposedly in possession of the police at all times, and if Feinstein asked for and received permission to use them in her presentation, isn't that an admission of unprofessional political bias on the part of the police?
Also, it's important to dispose of the Constitutional question here. The relevant clause reads:
...shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony, and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their attendance at the Session of their Respective Houses, and in going to and from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.In DC, possession of any firearm that can fire more than 12 rounds without reloading is considered possession of a machine gun. Possession of a "machine gun" so defined is punishable by up to 10 years in prison. A felony is any crime punishable by more than one year in prison.
The Speech and Debate clause does not protect Senator Feinstein in this case.
Check the groups below and enter your email address to receive updates by email:
The trackback URL for this entry is: http://triggerfinger.org/weblog/servlet/trackback/7993
No trackbacks have been posted so far.
No comments have been posted so far.