TriggerFinger


BlogRoll

From the Barrel of a Gun
Lurking Rhythmically
Random Nuclear Strikes
Daily Pundit
Borepatch
Only Guns and Money
Mostly Cajun
Massad Ayoob
The View From North Central Idaho
Armed and Dangerous
Hell in a Handbasket
View From The Porch
Patterico
Guns, Cars, and Tech
Alphecca
Legal Insurrection
Irons in the Fire
Volokh Conspiracy
Snowflakes in Hell
Shot in the Dark
MArooned
Power Line
Michael Bane
Reason
The Smallest Minority
Publicola
Sharp as a Marble
The Silicon Greybeard
3 boxes of BS
Saysuncle
Alphecca
Of Arms and the Law
Bacon, Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, Explosives
Infodancer
Speculative Fiction
GunBlogBlackList
John Lott
Confiscation

Categories

FeedBoomershoot 2008 

Most Popular

Featured Posts

Standard-capacity magazine ban introduced in the House


You should probably let your Congressperson know to OPPOSE the new legislation, even if you have already told them to oppose new gun control in general.  It helps to provide specific instructions about individual pieces of legislation.

This bill is being introduced by one of the usual suspects -- Carolyn McCarthy.  It's worth noting that the legislation would ban the sale or transfer of magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds, but not the simple possession -- at least according to the article.  However, since magazines are not registered nor tracked by serial number, it would be impossible to examine a particular magazine to determine if it violated the law or not.  Anyone could be prosecuted for "transfer" on the word of an informant -- or for including a few magazines along with the legal sale of the firearm they are designed for.  It would be impossible to prove whether any magazine in your possession was a legal, pre-ban magazine that you had not sold or transferred.

There are millions of these standard capacity magazines in circulation for a wide variety of firearms.  Each and every one would place its owner into substantial legal jeopardy should this bill pass.  Remember, that's what they want.  The more legal uncertainty that comes along with being a gun owner, the more risk it takes to maintain the capacity of self-defense independent of the State, the better.

This entry was published 2013-01-08 00:41:45.0 by matthew@triggerfinger.org and last updated 2013-01-08 00:41:45.0. [Tweet]

Recent Entries

Most Popular

Featured Entries

Related Categories

comments powered by Disqus
If you would like to receive new posts by email:

I am not a lawyer, and nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice. this site is run on custom blog software and is being actively developed. Please be forgiving of errors.


This website is an Amazon affiliate and will receive financial compensation for products purchased from Amazon through links on this site.