Proven legal theories?
|
In attempting to challenge the legal fees proposed by the winning team in the Heller case, DC's Attorney General described the Heller case as using "proven legal theories" and thus, according to him, is not worth a fee enhancement despite being "significant" and "above-average". If that was the case, why didn't DC settle the case and change it's laws? There's just no way to make that argument coherent. |
Check the groups below and enter your email address to receive updates by email:
The trackback URL for this entry is: http://triggerfinger.org/weblog/servlet/trackback/7486
No trackbacks have been posted so far.