|
One of the commenters on Megan's post suggested that a rapier was a better defensive weapon for an apartment than a firearm: Is this for home defence, or concealed carry? If only the former,
I'd actually recommend forgoing the gun and investing in a bladed
weapon, preferably something with a decent reach that can still be
wielded one-handed, such as a rapier. Jokes about bringing a knife to a
gunfight aside, in the small dimensions of an apartment, you will
always have sufficient proximity to an intruder to have the upper hand
over anyone who doesn't begin the encounter by pointing a gun at you,
in which case you're scrod no matter what's in your arsenal. A sword is
easier to learn how to handle, is much easier to maintain, is never
unloaded, and if, heaven forfend, there should ever be a tragic
accident involving your weapon, it is much harder to have a lethal
accident involving a sword than a firearm of any sort. And any of the
less-used lower tech weapons brings with it a psychological
intimidation factor.
I'm in favor of gun rights, but I believe in having the right tool
for a job. For home defence, in any home where the maximum sightline is
less than 15 feet, that's a blade.
Here's how I responded: Michael,
Defending your apartment with a sword? I'm fond of swords myself and
own several high-quality blades, but I'll be going for a gun to defend
myself. And that's from someone with the muscle and training to
effectively use those swords.
We stopped using swords as serious weapons hundreds of years ago,
and we did it for a reason: guns work better. Guns need less training,
less physical strength, and are more effective at stopping an attack.
Since you're talking about "sightlines of less than 15 feet" I
assume you are basing your thinking on the general assumption that
someone within 21 feet with a knife can close and use the knife before
a defender with a holstered gun can draw and fire. This is accurate as
far as it goes, but it's far from the whole story. Just consider how
well you would fare in the same scenario trying to draw your rapier!
One strike with a bladed weapon is not necessarily fatal, and one
shot from a handgun is a lot more likely to end the fight permanently.
There's no reason to give up the advantages of a firearm in favor of
merely equalizing your defensive options against an attacker armed with
a knife.
A firearm is not a magical talisman that will keep its owner safe
from harm. It's just the best tool available for self-defense. I confess to not being able to make up my mind whether Michael is a true believer in gun control trying to win points by conceding the concealed-carry issue (since it's not currently legal for ordinary folk in DC anyway), or actually thinks he's giving good advice.
|