Patterico analyzes two of Alito's cases
|
On the case of the strip-searched child, he thinks the legal issues are narrower than the media complaints, and he's got some good points. And on Alito's dissent in Planned Parent v Casey
(written before the Supreme Court ruling on that same case), he has an
antidote for the likely tactics of the left: Alito was defending a notification provision, not a consent provision. I have absolutely no objections to a requirement for married women to notify their husbands before obtaining an abortion, given that there are appropriate exceptions -- such as abuse, death of the spouse, etc. And the law had such exceptions. |
Check the groups below and enter your email address to receive updates by email:
The trackback URL for this entry is: http://triggerfinger.org/weblog/servlet/trackback/6861
No trackbacks have been posted so far.
No comments have been posted so far.
![[Valid Atom]](/weblog/images/valid-atom.png "Validate my Atom feed"){kind=small}
![[Valid RSS]](/weblog/images/valid-rss.png "Validate my RSS feed"){kind=small}
