From the Barrel of a Gun
Lurking Rhythmically
Random Nuclear Strikes
Daily Pundit
Only Guns and Money
Mostly Cajun
Massad Ayoob
The View From North Central Idaho
Armed and Dangerous
Hell in a Handbasket
View From The Porch
Guns, Cars, and Tech
Legal Insurrection
Irons in the Fire
Volokh Conspiracy
Snowflakes in Hell
Shot in the Dark
Power Line
Michael Bane
The Smallest Minority
Sharp as a Marble
The Silicon Greybeard
3 boxes of BS
Of Arms and the Law
Bacon, Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, Explosives
Speculative Fiction
John Lott
IRS Scandal
Monster Hunter Nation
Right to be Armed

Most Popular

Featured Posts

Subscribe to Atom Feed

Tweets by @TriggerBlog


Help stop RFID in California IDs

A new California bill seeks to protect your privacy from covert scanning.  The Identity Information Protection Act (SB 682), authored by Senator Joe Simitian (D-Palo Alto), would prohibit state, county, or municipal governments in California from issuing or requiring RFID-embedded identity documents.  RFIDs, or Radio Frequency Identification tags, could enable remote reading of the personal information on your driver's license, health benefits card, or student ID. RFID tags are small embedded chips in documents and objects that respond to remote radio signal requests with identifying data.  If RFID tags are included in state IDs, personal data could be scanned without your knowledge or permission, exposing you to the risk of tracking, stalking, and identity theft.  Furthermore, the signals emitted from RFID tags could be used to quickly identify American citizens in foreign countries.  RFID-embedded government ID is a bad idea.
It's hard enough keeping these things out of passports.  No one should be able to read your identification information without your consent -- and that means physically taking possession of the ID to attach it to a reader device.  If RFIDs are ever included in a standard identity document, freedom of association is dead -- along with any vestige of privacy.  The EFF has a way you can send comments in support of the bill.  I think this is a preemptive measure, but there's nothing wrong with telling unelected public servants what they shall not do before they try to do it.

This entry was published 2005-09-24 10:43:35.0 by TriggerFinger and last updated 2005-09-24 10:43:35.0. [Tweet]

comments powered by Disqus

Recent Entries

Most Popular

Featured Entries

Related Categories

If you would like to receive new posts by email:

I am not a lawyer, and nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice. this site is run on custom blog software and is being actively developed. Please be forgiving of errors.

This website is an Amazon affiliate and will receive financial compensation for products purchased from Amazon through links on this site.