The loopholes that CNN may wiggle through...
Based on a close reading of this transcript
(and kudos to The Smallest Minority for finding it), CNN may have some
room to wiggle out of the felony problem. The catch is, it
involves admitting that they deliberately misled their viewers in
I should note, for the record, that I don't think this transcript matches the video I saw; it probably matches the broadcast version instead. The main differences are in the sequence of scenes (the Barrett interview is moved further up), and I think there is also some additional information at the tail end that wasn't in the video I saw.
Here's the relevant section:
On the Internet, you learn all the new nuances and all the loopholes of buying a gun. If I bought that through a licensed dealer, I'd have to clear a background check. I would have to show proof of age, proof of residency. By going through a private seller, private seller, private buyer, it's strictly a cash transaction. We made sure that the two, the buyer and the seller, were in the same state. And after that, cash and carry.So what I'm hearing from this passage is that Griffin is not, himself, the purchaser. He's referring to the buyer in the third person. This is the straw sale angle. The straw sale is probably not illegal, because no one filled out a 4473. However, it still looks like a straw sale to me at first glance. This is mostly based on the video, which features Griffin himself pretending to be the purchaser. Technically, however, he may not be. We don't know, because the details aren't in the video.
IF Griffin now owns the rifle, and took it "home" to Atlanta, that would be a violation of GCA'68 (purchasing a rifle outside of your state of residence and transporting it into your state of residence without using an FFL). On the video, it sure looks like that's what he did. He picks up the gun case from the baggage claim area, and there's no one else (besides the cameraman) in the visible area. But that could be staged. He could be pretending to claim it. We don't know for sure, because we don't know what's on that luggage tag. That could be the straw Texan's luggage.
So what information do we need to settle this?
If they can do that, they are only guilty of misleading the public something awful, because the whole video is set up from the perspective of Griffin being the buyer. If you aren't listening very carefully, you'll miss the fact that he usually says "we" and the explanatory bit at the end. Plus, there's this:
(voice-over): But before I shelled out $2,500 to buy this gun, I wanted to make sure I could buy ammunition. That turned out to be as easy as ordering flowers. With just a couple of clicks on my computer, I ordered and paid by credit card for 50 .50-caliber armor- piercing rounds.That's where he slips up and says "I". Everywhere else he says "we", even though there's usually no one but Griffin visible to the camera.
If Griffin/CNN paid for the gun, it's hard to imagine that he wouldn't be considered the actual owner. But that's the argument that CNN will need to make if the BATFE decides to investigate this.
Check the groups below and enter your email address to receive updates by email:
The trackback URL for this entry is: http://triggerfinger.org/weblog/servlet/trackback/6241
No trackbacks have been posted so far.
No comments have been posted so far.