An anti-gun reporter gets an education...
It's rare to see a "journalist" admit to being wrong about an issue like this. On the other hand, if just a little visit to a gun store could dispell this person's prejudices and provide accurate information about the law, why did this visit not take place before the law expired, while "journalists" were desperately seeking to prop up the law? Fact is, this guy went out to take pictures of "evil black guns" being sold following the expiration of the ban. He got an education instead, and for that we should be thankful -- but it's not why he went to the store, and he clearly didn't bother to investigate the law before it expired. Apparantly assumptions made in ignorance are good enough to write newsvocacy pieces. |
Check the groups below and enter your email address to receive updates by email:
The trackback URL for this entry is: http://triggerfinger.org/weblog/servlet/trackback/5836
No trackbacks have been posted so far.
No comments have been posted so far.
