SCOTUS upholds 2nd Amendment right to stun guns

Sebastian has the details. The decision was unanimous, which is interesting to say the least.

I have my doubts about why the vote was unanimous, but I'm not going to look a gift horse in the mouth.

There may be some unintended consequences here too; if "stun guns", which are not really guns at all, can be protected by the second amendment, swords and knives should also be, along with other forms of "arms" that are not "firearms". That's going to be concrete and helpful precedent.

This entry was published Sun Apr 10 09:18:25 CDT 2016 by TriggerFinger and last updated 2016-04-10 09:18:25.0. [Tweet]

comments powered by Disqus

Subscribe to Atom Feed

I am not a lawyer, and nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice.

This site is run on custom blog software and is being actively developed. Please be forgiving of errors.

This website is an Amazon affiliate and will receive financial compensation for products purchased from Amazon through links on this site.