I have my doubts about why the vote was unanimous, but I'm not going to look a gift horse in the mouth.
There may be some unintended consequences here too; if "stun guns", which are not really guns at all, can be protected by the second amendment, swords and knives should also be, along with other forms of "arms" that are not "firearms". That's going to be concrete and helpful precedent.
This entry was published Sun Apr 10 09:18:25 CDT 2016 by TriggerFinger
and last updated 2016-04-10 09:18:25.0.
[Tweet]
